Taking the High Ground in Technology Stack Standardization

Why Having a Standard Technology Stack is Critical to Your Business

If you want to get to Best-in-Class, then you need to develop, adopt and enforce the use of technology standards across virtually all (>95%) of your customers. In this newsletter, we’ll discuss why, this is a key practice of top-performing (Best-in-Class) Solution Providers. We’ll also provide strategies for not only defining and maintaining a standard technology stack, but also the reasons for enforcing compliance of these standards for all customers.

Driving the use of technology standards enables Service quality, scalability and profit, and reduces overhead costs by increasing the effectiveness of the go-to-market plan. While true in Services-Centric firms, it is also true in Product-Centric firms, where too-broad standards typically result in low Service margin and quality, and slow responsiveness to Sales, which in turn often results in low Sales enthusiasm for selling Services. Ironically, narrowing technology standards improves Service quality, margin and responsiveness to Sales. These in turn accelerate Service Revenue growth and, if desired Product Revenue growth along with it. The key to growing Product and Service Revenue faster is selling a narrower range of products.

Employing a technology standard also helps improve market differentiation by enabling a greater degree of specialization and expertise, which becomes evident through Marketing and customer experience to current and prospective customers. As the standards-enabled, improved Service methodology drives higher Service quality, Service Revenue is further accelerated by better account retention and improved referral selling.

Well-defined technology standards improve profitability by reducing the number of operational variables that must be taken into account in managing to success. Thus, reducing complexity and investment across a wide variety of strategic to tactical factors.


Narrowing the Range of Technologies You Support

Top-performing Solution Providers drive their technology standards starting with Marketing, through Sales and then into the onboarding and Service interactions with each prospect and customer. They have two pervasive characteristics: A focused, differentiated go-to-market strategy, and an efficient and effective Sales and Service delivery methodology. Moreover, they understand that the most efficient way to clarify their own value proposition is to do so on the basis of a well-defined and relatively narrow solution set – i.e., technology standards.

The reason for dramatically narrowing the range of technologies you will support under Managed Services is simple and has been proven for decades: It’s not possible to provide good support on a sustainable, predictable budget across a too-broad range of technologies.

This is a basic management tenet of IT operations. Those Solution Providers that disregard it find themselves faced with constant challenges of meeting committed Service levels and continually aggravated Service labor costs. Lack of standardization plays havoc with many cost and quality functions: The budgets for technical headcount, technical training, tools, process development and automation are all diluted across too many technologies. This results in either strongly escalating costs or increasingly poor Service quality, or both.

Solution Providers must and can dramatically narrow the range of technologies they support, actively controlling what their customers buy and use across the entire technology stack. By doing so, they start a virtuous cycle that is not readily apparent before taking the steps to implement it. The outgrowth of this virtuous cycle is numerous:

  • Customers (and therefore Salespeople) are primarily interested in Service quality, not price.
  • Narrowing the range of technology supported is the key enabler of Service quality, especially as the installed base of contracts grows.
  • When Service quality goes up, customer satisfaction goes up, which in turn increases testimonials, Sales representative enthusiasm and willingness, and referrals (the primary lead source of most SMB and mid-market focused Solution Providers).
  • When the range of technologies is narrowed, the entire sequence of pre-Sales and early post-Sales activities is shortened. The reason for this is that getting to the end-state configuration is a known, well-tested and well-rehearsed process. The time needed for assessments, pricing, proposing, negotiating, closing, onboarding, ramp to Service Level Agreement (SLA) attainment, and first billing are all reduced as much as possible. This improves Sales cost, Gross Margin, and cash flow. This shortened time also results – again – in a happier customer and a happier Sales representative.
  • Service Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) reductions are also enabled by narrowing technology standards; in turn, enabling you to compete at lower prices (while maintaining above-market Gross Margins). Interestingly, higher performing Managed Service Providers (MSPs) typically use value pricing and therefore don’t compete as much on price, but the reduced COGS enables them to do so when desired.
  • Lower Service COGS also results in higher Service Gross Margins, which typically increase the commissions, further building enthusiasm among the Sales team.

Narrowing the range of supported technologies results in more referrals, more testimonials and greater excitement and commitment by the Sales team. It is also a key enabler of scalability, which permits the growth of, and reduces attrition from, the account base. Taken together, these factors mean that Revenue growth accelerates significantly when the customers are required to comply with your technology stack.

Another benefit of narrowing the range of technologies is that over time you will realize dramatic improvements in operational and financial results including:

  • Greater Staff Flexibility: The more consistent your customers are, the easier it is for your technical team to move between them. Staff levels can be lower because you don’t need to cover as many different technical specialties. You can also spread off-hours work across a broader set of people because the basics about any given account are the same and known by everyone.
  • Less Staff Training: If you only have one backup system or one type of firewall, you only need to train your team on those specific products. Less documentation is required as well.
  • Lower Inventory Costs: Having the right parts on-hand for hot swaps is easier when there’s a limited number to stock.
  • Easier Software Management: The more consistent your software environment is across customers, the easier it is to manage.
  • Current Hardware and Software Benefits: By evolving your set of standards, and maintaining customer compliance to those standards, your customers never use outdated or obsolete hardware and software. Having a predetermined and universal set of standards can serve as a catalyst for upgrading customers to current norms.

Determining Your Unique Set of Technology Standards

Every organization will have its own unique set of technology standards. You and your team should start by first assessing the factors which will shape the technology standards for your organization, including:

  • What technology have you currently deployed in your customer base?
  • Where does your existing staff have real expertise?
  • What are your current practices for existing customers?
  • What are your leading vendor relationships and what assistance can/will they provide in helping you develop your technology standards?

Ideally, every customer has an identical environment. In reality, it’s never that simple. New customers and even existing customers that you wish to transition to a Managed Services model are likely to have a mix of hardware and software already in place.

Once you have created the list of standards, the next step is to determine which standards are non-negotiable and which ones have flexibility. An example of a non-negotiable requirement might be anti-virus software – every customer is required to run the same package. There might be more flexibility in a server or workstation configuration, but again, determine what is absolutely required and what is optional. Make sure this is documented and fully understood by both your Sales and Service teams so that they can set clear expectations for the customer.

Branding Your Standard Technology Stack

Once you have completed defining your standard technology stack (products, version numbers and standard configurations), now take the next step of branding it. Here’s an example of a good brand you can’t use, since we’ve copyrighted it1: “Business Optimization Architecture”.

As in: “<myMSPcompany> Business Optimization Architecture v4.2”.

Again, don’t actually use “Business Optimization Architecture” for the reason shown in the footnote below.

Timing of Completing the Standardization Project

Now that you have a good idea of what it takes to narrow your range of technologies, you’re probably wondering how long will it take to complete this whole standardization project? Let’s do a comparison of how low, medium and high Operational Maturity Level (OML)2 MSPs approach this project.

In the chart below, we can see how those at low OML usually handle standardization.

As you can see, they don’t standardize, they only stabilize, that is, make the network stable enough to eliminate most urgent calls. In their rush to “make the customer happy” and to get to the first month’s recurring billing, they start the Managed Services even before stabilization (much less standardization) has occurred.

They may replace a few things with standards, but by and large they leave the existing (non-standard) products and configurations in place. They may also try to set the customer’s expectations that over time they will implement their standards, but they take no concrete or firms steps in doing so.

There are several problems with this approach:

  • It sets the Service organization up to fail. A Service organization that is skilled enough to provide good Service dealing with a mish-mash of equipment and software – even if the mish-mash is made up of new and reputable products – is a Service organization whose employees are highly skilled and therefore not only too expensive, but also unlikely to choose to live in such pressure for long. More likely, their skills and their available time are not sufficient, and they will fail to deliver good service, either to the non-standard customer, or the customer they are ignoring while they try to service the non-standard one, or both.
  • People in a Service organization who have been set up to fail, can find it hard to have a good attitude. Likewise, Sales people who see the Service team (and the customer) set up to fail often have a hard time being enthusiastic about the Service offering.
  • The non-standard customer, even if their expectations have been set that they will become standard over time, most often drag their feet when the times comes to standardize. This is because the technology is good enough for them, and they often don’t understand that this is not the only issue; it also has to be good enough (standard enough) for you to run a scalable, profitable operation with happy people. The customer must support a win/win outcome. They have transferred their financial and operational risk of running their IT to you – they have no choice but to allow you to standardize them.

The challenge is, you have solved their operational (and financial) problem. You have reduced their network problems, are providing good support and are staying within your flat fee – without solving your financial and operational problem, which is making money and building a scalable, happy operation.

MSPs at about OML 2.5 or so, become tired of this win/lose scenario, recognize that failure to implement standards for all customers, hobbles their scalability, requires their Service people to be non-stop super-heroes and their Sales people to ignore reality to maintain confidence. They take steps to enforce standardization which are usually internally viewed as a “lose” for the customer, but now an unavoidable requirement for them.

These steps include: Better expectation setting including stronger and clearer contract terms, refusing to start the Managed Services until stabilization is complete, and at least some level of basic standardization is in place. This can be seen in the chart below.

This is certainly a set of improvements that raise the number of customers that an MSP can reasonably support, but soon enough the same factors as complete non-standardization comes into play:

  • Hobbled scalability and Service quality,
  • Unreasonable and unsustainable demands placed on the Service and Sales people,
  • Sub-par profitability,
  • Still ultimately a win/lose relationship with the customer.

Put bluntly, win/lose relationships don’t last. At about OML 3.4 or so, MSPs realize these facts and finally take the proper step towards a win/win relationship:

  • Full standardization must be completed before the Managed Services can begin.

That is, they leave the customer in their current – sometimes desperate – state until they complete the standardization project. This is shown in the chart below.

The high OML MSPs use the customer’s general desperation to have better IT now, as the lever by which to get them to standardize now.

Of course, the high OML MSPs get their greater Revenue growth partially from requiring their customers to standardize fully right away:

  • Their Service team is set up to provide great Service without impossible super-heroics, from the start.
  • The customers get great Service from the start and over the longer term and provide more and better referrals,
  • Customer retention and agreement to annual price increases are higher,
  • The Sales people are more motivated to sell and more confident in their Sales motions.

It is likely that the lower OML competitors in the marketplace will tout their less-wise policies as competitive advantages. They may say something like: “We don’t make you standardize right away like those mean guys at <insert your company name here>. Unlike them, we have smart engineers who can handle your network as is (for now).”

This of course is the same tactic they will use with regard to your (higher) prices and your longer required contract term: “We know you’ll love us so much we’re willing to let you sign a month to month deal.”

Obviously, there is no magic to Managed Services. These less-capable MSPs are not magically providing great Service, making good money and building a happy, scalable business with these win/lose policies.

They are instead experiencing poor scalability, lower customer and employee retention, poor profits and poor growth.

The prospect that both you and your competition are trying to win must pass an intelligence test to become your customer, if you wish to build a profitable, scalable, growing and happy Managed Services operation. That test is standardization.

If they fail to pass that test, they will go to your competitor and have an unfortunate experience from which they will learn that you took the high road and told them the truth. They will be back, and they will be ready to agree to your win/win approach to the relationship. Meanwhile, there is no greater gift to give your competitor than a money-losing, pain-inducing customer.

Enforcing Technology Standards and Why You Need to Do It

Once you have defined your technology standards, you will then need to not only require, but enforce these standards internally and with your customers.

As you know by now, getting all your Managed Services customers onto your standard technology stack is critical to your Revenue growth, your Service quality (customer and employee happiness) and your profitability. For top performers, standardization is what they use to require compliance by all of their customers. Unfortunately, many low-performing MSPs know they should do this but struggle to “convince” customers to rip and replace equipment and software that does not meet their standards.

By now most customers are consciously or semi-consciously aware that IT manufacturers – especially software vendors – continually advance their products from Version 1 to Version 2 to Version 3, often accompanied by an upgrade fee. A given vendor may not call it a “version” but minor and major updates are a fact of life and mostly a desirable one.

A customer who is objecting to rip-and-replace is often consciously or semi-consciously expressing that they are at a vendor version level that is current or at least is satisfactory to them. Their error, when it comes to maintaining a win/win relationship with you, is that they often believe that current – or close to current or not very close at all – is good enough for them and therefore for you. They think the vendor is the arbiter of that decision.

The vendor is emphatically not the arbiter of that decision. You are. In saying “Yes’ to a Managed Services agreement, the customer is transitioning financial risk to you. It makes no more sense for them to expect you to accept their choice of equipment and software than it does for them to walk into a BMW dealer and ask to buy a new 5-Series but say:

“I would like your standard (all-inclusive four year) BMW Ultimate Service, but I would like you to remove your standard transmission and install my old Ford Cortina transmission because I like it better, it suits my purposes just fine, and I’m smarter than you are about transmissions anyway.”

The BMW dealer would never accept that from a customer. Even if the customer paid to have the old transmission installed (or the rest of the car “installed” around the old transmission) and paid some sort of “uplift”. This would kill the dealer’s ability to deliver quality Service and it would kill BMW’s reputation for quality. Plus, half of the dealer’s techs would quit and go to work somewhere that operated in closer alignment with sanity.

(It might be that you or some of your team may be convinced that standards aren’t good for the customer because “every customer needs a network custom-designed for their specific needs.” If so, we might suggest that this belief dates back to the days when system functionality was so crude and limited that customizations were needed to make the network even marginally valuable to the customer. With today’s products, the “built-in” functionality is so high that it’s entirely possible to have each customer’s network be 95% identical to the next customer’s – and the 5% variance be only in certain places – such that you have effectively attained production-level standardization. If you’re still a believer in the need for custom networks, can we suggest you may either be drinking vendor Kool-Aid or better off building a Project-Centric rather than Managed Services-Centric business.)

The good news is you can capitalize on this tendency of customers to calibrate their thinking to version numbers and simultaneously transfer their attention to vendor version numbers to you instead. Below is an example of a technique top-quartile MSPs (those with the highest growth, Service quality and profit) use to take the high ground in getting clients to standardize from the start.

Technique Top-Quartile MSPs Use to Set Standardization Expectations

One technique top-quartile MSPs employ to increase the proportion of times that prospects are closed with proper expectations of standardization is by using the “Business Optimization Architecture” method (see footnote below).

It starts with your conversations with the decision maker prospects. You say:

“Bob, one of the key values we add is that we are constantly researching new technology developments to incorporate into our efficient and effective technology design for our successful small business customers, so that you don’t have to guess what works, or expend R&D efforts yourself. We are currently at myMSPcompany Business Optimization Architecture version 4.2, which we’ll bring you up to as we get started.

This is how we provide this great Service level at this great budget, and how we can afford to stay ahead of you in your technology planning and budgeting. About every 18 months, we will upgrade you to the latest version of Business Optimization Architecture. You’ll know about it well in advance for your budget purposes because part of our Quarterly Business Reviews together is forward budget planning to keep your IT spending in the most efficient and effective support of your business goals.”

In one step, you have unhooked the customer from the vendors’ upgrade cycles and hooked them to yours, while simultaneously setting their expectations about full standardization during on-boarding and further establishing the value of your Quarterly Business Reviews.

It’s possible that some customers who views themselves as less reliant on technology, may say, “Yes, but I’m not interested in having the latest and greatest. I don’t need to be on the leading edge.” In which case, your response would be:

“Bob, I’m glad you said that because we’re in strong agreement about the leading edge. We’ve found from long experience that having the latest and greatest is a formula for higher costs and lower productivity in your business. You’ll almost never find us incorporating any vendor’s latest version in our Business Optimization Architecture, because the latest versions almost always have the most bugs and require us to have too many of the most expensive, high-skilled people.

We use our precious rocket scientists to evolve Business Optimization Architecture to keep you on the leading edge of productivity, cost effectiveness and protection against the unexpected, not the latest technology for technology’s sake. And through our Quarterly Business Reviews, you’ll always know three to four quarters in advance, what your IT budget will be. This is how we’ve come to win the confidence of many of the successful small businesses like yours, here in Smallville/Metropolis.”

Obviously, this is not a silver bullet that will work with every prospect. But, MSPs with top quartile profitability, growth and Service quality use this technique to leverage the customer’s understanding of “versions” to focus them on getting to their standards right away and for the long term, in a win/win fashion.

Progression Considerations

Progressing in this standardization project can occur rapidly and does so when the leadership of the Solution Provider comes to two realizations. The first is that they will need to drive towards a set of technical standards to organize how they think about, manage and market their business. This realization lays the groundwork for the second, more profound realization: They must drive these standards into their customers and prospects with real discipline. This happens with the decision not to take any more non-standard customers. Starting with your next prospect, the prospective client must agree to adopt your technology standards within a reasonable period of time or you cannot accept them as a customer.

While developing the standards can happen very quickly, driving these technology standards is most safely accomplished without skipping levels. Effective progression requires changing the culture to narrow the standards. You should also operate against these standards internally and evolve the Sales process and compensation to support the Sales team driving the installed base. You should also drive towards having prospective customers comply or pay a substantial premium for non-compliance. All of this takes disciplined, sequential improvement.

However, there are pitfalls in driving technical standards. The first is to make it an internally focused exercise, without understanding the market and competitive environment. Most notably what will it take to be the Solution Provider of choice to your target customer. Additionally, your Sales team needs to be retrained and fully enabled against your technology standards to most effectively use the standards to narrow their field of view to customers who will adopt your technology standards.

While Service drives the development of your technology standards, Marketing and Sales must drive those standards into your installed base of customers and prospective customers.

In addition to operational improvements, the Sales team also benefits in very real and measurable ways. As you begin to impose technology standards, keep an eye on key Sales metrics: cycle time to close, overall close rates, and average Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) per Managed Services deal. The Sales team may experience challenges until they have learned new prospecting, qualification and sales pitches. As the Sales team progresses, you will start seeing a markedly faster sales cycle, at higher prices and increasingly against more and more of your technology standards.

The costs of developing technology standards for each major solution segment is significant. In addition, you must consider the cost of keeping your technology standards updated as underlying technology vendors’ product offerings evolve. This can run 3% or more of Top (Best-in-Class) Solution Providers annual Revenues – in both hard costs and the soft costs of the manpower devoted to this task. As a result, these top performers seek to control this cost and speed time-to-market by partnering with relatively few vendors. Of course, the quality and completeness of the vendor’s standard architecture is also key to its value and usefulness.

If you need help standardizing your technology stack, please contact us to learn more about the tools and services available.


Service Leadership is dedicated to providing total profit solutions for IT Solution and Service Providers, directly and through industry consultants and global technology vendors. The company publishes the leading vendor-neutral, Solution Provider financial and operational benchmark: Service Leadership Index®. This includes private diagnostic benchmarks for individual Solution Providers and their business coaches and consultants. The company also publishes SLIQ, the exclusive web application for partner owners and executives to drive financial improvements by confidentially assessing and driving their Operational Maturity Level.

Service Leadership offers advanced peer groups for Solution Providers of all sizes and business models, and individual management consulting engagements for Solution Providers from US$15mm to US$3bb in size worldwide. In addition, Service Leadership provides global technology OEM with advanced partner enablement assets, partner ROI models, management consulting and advanced peer groups, as well as executive and industry best practices education and speaking. Please visit www.service-leadership.com for more information.

Notice: All materials published (electronically or print) by Service Leadership are proprietary and subject to trademark and copyright protections, regardless of where and how it is sourced. The terms and concepts of SLIQ, Service Leadership Index®, (S-L Index), Predominant Business Model (PBM), Operational Maturity Level (OML), Normalized Solution Provider Charts of Accounts (NSPCoA), Total Cost of Managed Services (TCMS) and Service Factory are proprietary to Service Leadership, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

1 We copyrighted it so we don’t have dozens of well-intentioned MSPs in the marketplace literally using “Business Optimization Architecture” as their stack branding. Be different by thinking up your own great brand for your technology stack.

2 There is a positive correlation between a Solution Provider’s Operational Maturity Level and their financial performance. We’ve identified five levels of operational maturity from Level 1 (Beginning) to Level 5 (Innovating). The higher you progress in operational maturity, the closer you are to achieving and sustaining Best-in-Class profitability and growth.

Contact Us